User talk:JWSchmidt

Regarding page naming
I wasn't going to have any identifiers in the actual page name but instead let categorising do that. I only used the game identifier for Payback because there's also a well-known Mel Gibson movie of the same name that will no doubt get a review sometime, so I was trying to future-proof it. But it can stay like that now, it won't matter.

Actually I'm thinking that for books, since they can have rather generic names like An Introduction to Psychology, that perhaps the author name should be in the core page name to avoid clashes.

The categorisation issue is already immensely complicated, and yet it won't be until we've got some actual content to work with that we'll find out what works and what doesn't.

Anyway, thanks for adding that review. Now that's three sample categories covered. :) Garrett 07:51, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Neutral introduction page
Well, how about just setting it up so that in case there's going to be a second review, not much work has to be done? MessedRocker 17:23, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)
 * That's the beautiful part of a wiki -- do as much or as little work as you'd like, and others will be around to pick up the slack. MessedRocker 17:31, 12 Nov 2005 (UTC)

Retention
Thanks for the welcome. How likely is it that anything contributed to Wikia will stay around, barring any total shutdown of Wikia? Do wikis sometimes get closed, and, if so, what happens to their content? --o 18:18, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm asking more about how often wikis get deleted from Wikia. Obviously there are theoretical situations in which wikis are deleted, like if its content is illegal, but where is the line? Would a wiki ever be deleted for lack of activity, possibly because the effort to revert vandalism is too high to justify keeping it? --o 03:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)